🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently spent years building community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.