🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam order, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that may create several five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, approves a request by the state to overturn a lower court's injunction that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating much confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its ruling.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Opposition

In a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican control. Usually, boundary revision takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic officials lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A leading House leader said the court had yet again eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.